United States v. New York City

A coalition of 75 cities, counties, and elected officials is pushing back against the Trump administration’s efforts to compel New York City to enforce its harmful immigration policies. On behalf of the coalition, Public Rights Project filed an amicus brief, arguing that New York City’s policies don’t conflict with federal law.

The brief was filed in a case brought by the U.S. Department of Justice, which aims to force New York City to abandon its so-called “sanctuary policies” and engage in federal immigration enforcement. The city filed a motion to dismiss the case on December 2.

The brief explains that the U.S. Constitution gives local governments — not the federal government — the authority to make decisions about their communities’ police resources. It also highlights the real benefits of so-called “sanctuary policies.”

• They make communities safer by building trust between law enforcement and all residents, so people will report crimes and cooperate with police.
• They strengthen local economies because immigrants play a vital role in the workforce across many industries.
• They support public health by ensuring people can access medical care without fear, protecting community well-being.

Our brief explains why, under existing law, the court should dismiss the case.

In similar challenges, PRP is representing Boston and recently filed briefs in support of Minnesota, four New Jersey cities, and Rochester, New York.

Read the amicus brief.