- What We do
- Legal Advocacy
- Uber Technologies, Inc., and Portier, LLC v. City of Seattle
Uber Technologies, Inc., and Portier, LLC v. City of Seattle
On March 18, 2025, Public Rights Project filed an amicus brief in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in support of the City of Seattle in a case related to workers’ rights and disclosures. The cities of Portland, Ore., and San Diego, Calif. joined the brief.
App-based companies Uber and Instacart sued Seattle over a law that requires companies to give workers 14 days’ notice before they are deactivated from their platform. The companies claim the law violates the First Amendment.
Our brief explains the well-established practice by cities and states to regulate economic activity to protect the public. We argue that lawmakers are permitted to enact policies that ensure workers and others are informed of their rights and of a company’s internal policies. We note that requiring companies to issue disclosures to notify workers is common across a variety of sectors, including child care and higher education.
The brief urges the court to affirm the district court’s previous ruling that regulation of economic activity is not a violation of the First Amendment.
-
Legal case1/9/2026
Watson v. Republican National Committee
Public Rights Project filed an amicus brief on behalf of 16 local election officials and…
-
Legal case1/6/2026
Re: Comment in Response to Petition of America First Legal Foundation for Rulemaking Before the Election Assistance Commission (August 21, 2025)
Public Rights Project submitted a public comment to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) on…
-
Legal case1/6/2026
United States v. California
On behalf of 14 California local governments and leaders, Public Rights Project filed an amicus…