- What We do
- Legal Advocacy
- Public Rights Project’s Statement on Wisconsin Attorney General’s Opinion Regarding Election Administration
Public Rights Project’s Statement on Wisconsin Attorney General’s Opinion Regarding Election Administration
On June 25, 2024, Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul issued a legal opinion clarifying the state’s new constitutional provision, which prohibits non-election officials from performing “task[s] in the conduct of . . . election[s].”
Kaul’s opinion responds to Dane County’s request for guidance and clarification on the provision’s language. In May, Public Rights Project submitted a comment on behalf of a coalition of 18 municipal clerks in support of the county’s request.
Kaul’s opinion makes clear that while only “election officials” as defined in Wisconsin statute can play a role in “directing or leading the administration of [an] election.” It also emphasizes that election officials may continue to rely on vendors, other government employees, and volunteers to perform other election-related activities necessary to ensure free and secure elections.
Kaul’s opinion recognizes that the provision was intended to prevent outside actors from playing a management role in election administration. Although Wisconsin courts aren’t required to follow an attorney general’s opinion, they often do so.
“We applaud Attorney General Kaul for his thoughtful and thorough opinion,” said Graham Provost, staff attorney for Public Rights Project’s Election Protection Hub. “The opinion does exactly what we had hoped for. It adopts the most legally compelling interpretation of Article III § 7(2), and provides Wisconsin clerks with the certainty they need to do their jobs and effectively administer this year’s elections.”
-
Legal case1/6/2026
Re: Comment in Response to Petition of America First Legal Foundation for Rulemaking Before the Election Assistance Commission (August 21, 2025)
Public Rights Project submitted a public comment to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) on…
-
Legal case1/6/2026
United States v. California
On behalf of 14 California local governments and leaders, Public Rights Project filed an amicus…
-
Legal case12/22/2025
Re: Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
In partnership with New York City and 16 local governments, Public Rights Project opposed the…