- What We do
- Legal Advocacy
- Lujan v. FMCSA, King County v. DOT
Lujan v. FMCSA, King County v. DOT
A coalition of 19 local governments and officials filed an amicus brief in two cases about who can hold a commercial driver’s license. Public Rights Project, Democracy Forward, and law firm Kaplan Kirsch filed the brief on the coalition’s behalf.
In September 2025, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) issued an interim final rule stripping the ability from some non-citizens of having a commercial driver’s license. The plaintiffs in the cases have asked the court to block the rule, and for an emergency suspension of the rule while it is reviewed by the court. The coalition filed the brief in support of that request.
The brief explains that limiting the number of commercial driver’s licenses will hurt local communities by reducing the number of available drivers, especially in the face of nationwide driver shortages. This could make communities less safe and make it harder for local governments to deliver essential services.
For example, if a city has a snowplow driver shortage, it might have to close roads. This will only make it more difficult for ambulances, fire trucks, or police to reach people in need. The brief also argues that public transportation, school buses, construction, and nationwide shipping, and highway maintenance would all be disrupted if the rule takes effect.
Update:
On Nov. 10, the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington DC issued an administrative stay of the federal rule. This temporarily blocks FMCSA from enforcing the rule while the court reviews the case.
Update:
On Nov. 13, the appeals court stayed the rule, pausing the enforcement of the rule based on the merits of the case. The court found that the petitioners would likely succeed in at least three of their challenges to the rule, including:
- FMCSA improperly issued the rule without consulting with states
- FMCSA did not provide a sufficient reason for bypassing the public comment period
- FMCSA did not provide a satisfactory reason for how the rule would promote safety
-
Legal case2/5/2026
United States v. Minnesota
138 cities, counties, and elected officials are pushing back against the Trump administration’s efforts to…
-
Legal case1/23/2026
Minnesota v. Noem
On behalf of over 80 local governments and leaders, Public Rights Project filed an amicus…
-
Legal case1/9/2026
Watson v. Republican National Committee
Public Rights Project filed an amicus brief on behalf of 16 local election officials and…