- What We do
- Legal Advocacy
- Re: Comments to Department of Education in response to Intent to Receive Public Feedback for the Development of Proposed Regulations and Establish Negotiated Rulemaking Committee
Re: Comments to Department of Education in response to Intent to Receive Public Feedback for the Development of Proposed Regulations and Establish Negotiated Rulemaking Committee
Public Rights Project (PRP) submitted a comment to the Department of Education opposing the Trump administration’s plans to narrow the definition of “qualifying employer” under the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program. The administration is currently creating a committee to make changes to PSLF and other loan programs.
The comment explains that if public service professions are restricted under PSLF, organizations like PRP will have difficulty hiring and retaining talent and fulfilling their missions to the public.
The comment cites student debt as a substantial barrier to entry for those interested in public service work, where wide disparities between debt and salaries exist. The comment highlights the origin of the PSLF program, explaining that Congress enacted it to encourage more people to enter public service professions. The comment concludes with an explanation of the real-world harm that organizations like PRP and its employees will experience.
-
Legal case1/6/2026
Re: Comment in Response to Petition of America First Legal Foundation for Rulemaking Before the Election Assistance Commission (August 21, 2025)
Public Rights Project submitted a public comment to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) on…
-
Legal case1/6/2026
United States v. California
On behalf of 14 California local governments and leaders, Public Rights Project filed an amicus…
-
Legal case12/22/2025
Re: Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
In partnership with New York City and 16 local governments, Public Rights Project opposed the…