- What We do
- Legal Advocacy
- Re: Comments to Department of Education in response to Intent to Receive Public Feedback for the Development of Proposed Regulations and Establish Negotiated Rulemaking Committee
Re: Comments to Department of Education in response to Intent to Receive Public Feedback for the Development of Proposed Regulations and Establish Negotiated Rulemaking Committee
Public Rights Project (PRP) submitted a comment to the Department of Education opposing the Trump administration’s plans to narrow the definition of “qualifying employer” under the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program. The administration is currently creating a committee to make changes to PSLF and other loan programs.
The comment explains that if public service professions are restricted under PSLF, organizations like PRP will have difficulty hiring and retaining talent and fulfilling their missions to the public.
The comment cites student debt as a substantial barrier to entry for those interested in public service work, where wide disparities between debt and salaries exist. The comment highlights the origin of the PSLF program, explaining that Congress enacted it to encourage more people to enter public service professions. The comment concludes with an explanation of the real-world harm that organizations like PRP and its employees will experience.
-
Legal case7/7/2025
Svitlana Doe v. Noem
Public Rights Project joined the city of Boston to file an amicus brief in a…
-
Legal case6/26/2025
Mid-America Milling Co. v. U.S. Department of Transportation
Public Rights Project filed an amicus brief supporting local governments in a court case that…
-
Legal case6/26/2025
Appalachian Voices v. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
A coalition of 15 nonprofits, one Tribe, and seven local governments filed a class action…